Future of higher ed. Will colleges survive
February 14th, 2012 by Jeanne Boyarsky
I attended Social media Week‘s future of higher ed talk. See my notes on the K-12 version or my notes on the higher ed version in this post.
- Traditional schools didn’t start online classes because didn’t think could do it as well. Included a shot at University of Phoenix. Social media is the first time the tools are there to support it. [I got my masters at Regis University. I think they did well because they had started with correspondence classes and saw how to enhance that model online.]
- Anything you learned in college you could have learned from a textbook. It is higher ed done right that makes the impact. Goal was to recreate campus online. Only let in students who could get in on campus and add interactions/networking with students. However, it is also about socialization and a safe environment to learn how to interact with the world. More undergrad interest in a semester online than an entire undergrad degree online.
- Expects more grad school online because more mature students, less expensive, fits life better. [regis had a work experience requirement to "screen" for maturity].
- Education outstrips inflation by two to three percent a year because salaries go up and we add technology. Since this compounds, it is approaching infeasible. [it isn't now?]. Can be less expensive by moving lecture online/interactive/self quiz. The classroom is for discussion. Or the online classroom. [regis did this well]
- Interesting conflict: onkine students can learn at different pace but need to engage/discuss together.
- Small programs don’t scale. Need a lot of students to recover investment for good course/program. To build scale, you need funding. At sone point, you can’t add more strong programs.
- It is much harder to teach online. You have to prepare much more.
Posted: 14 February, 2012 in Technology.
Tags: education, online, Social-media
Write a comment