<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: [kcdc 2022] level up with co-pilot	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.selikoff.net/2022/08/09/kcdc-2022-level-up-with-co-pilot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.selikoff.net/2022/08/09/kcdc-2022-level-up-with-co-pilot/</link>
	<description>Java/J2EE Software Development and Technology Discussion Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2022 13:11:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ulf		</title>
		<link>https://www.selikoff.net/2022/08/09/kcdc-2022-level-up-with-co-pilot/comment-page-1/#comment-303362</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ulf]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2022 13:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.selikoff.net/?p=16025#comment-303362</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not concerned about the ethics debate - I think most of what Copilot does would be fair use. But I am concerned about the security and quality of the resulting code. There&#039;s already too much &quot;development by StackOverflow&quot; going on, with all the consequences for quality and security one can imagine. Copilot takes this up another notch, as noted recently in the BlackHat conference (German article that does a good job summarizing at https://www.heise.de/news/Programmierhilfe-GitHub-Copilot-macht-Code-unsicherer-7217314.html, original paper at https://arxiv.org/pdf/2108.09293.pdf).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not concerned about the ethics debate &#8211; I think most of what Copilot does would be fair use. But I am concerned about the security and quality of the resulting code. There&#8217;s already too much &#8220;development by StackOverflow&#8221; going on, with all the consequences for quality and security one can imagine. Copilot takes this up another notch, as noted recently in the BlackHat conference (German article that does a good job summarizing at <a href="https://www.heise.de/news/Programmierhilfe-GitHub-Copilot-macht-Code-unsicherer-7217314.html" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.heise.de/news/Programmierhilfe-GitHub-Copilot-macht-Code-unsicherer-7217314.html</a>, original paper at <a href="https://arxiv.org/pdf/2108.09293.pdf" rel="nofollow ugc">https://arxiv.org/pdf/2108.09293.pdf</a>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
