Comments on: smlunit – using without a python dependency https://www.selikoff.net/2013/10/05/smlunit-without-python/ Java/J2EE Software Development and Technology Discussion Blog Sun, 02 Apr 2017 20:33:33 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 By: Frank https://www.selikoff.net/2013/10/05/smlunit-without-python/comment-page-1/#comment-188141 Sun, 02 Apr 2017 20:33:33 +0000 http://www.selikoff.net/?p=4852#comment-188141 Thanks for the blog entry. It is still useful, years later! And yes, also for the great PL/Grossman class.

BTW is it me or does smlunit not handle functions that take options as arguments? I did never get that working.

]]> By: Emil Wall https://www.selikoff.net/2013/10/05/smlunit-without-python/comment-page-1/#comment-6828 Thu, 21 Nov 2013 14:06:51 +0000 http://www.selikoff.net/?p=4852#comment-6828 I guess I’m a bit too late for this year’s course, but I have looked into SML testing frameworks and also written my own: https://github.com/emilwall/DescribeSML

I’ve listed a few in the appendix of my master thesis as well: https://github.com/emilwall/exjobb/blob/master/exjobb_thesis_emilwall_appendix.pdf?raw=true

]]> By: Jeanne Boyarsky https://www.selikoff.net/2013/10/05/smlunit-without-python/comment-page-1/#comment-6623 Mon, 14 Oct 2013 02:15:43 +0000 http://www.selikoff.net/?p=4852#comment-6623 A better way suggested in the class as a way to test it:
val actual = (functionToTest());
false)
handle IllegalMove => true)
assertTrue actual “message”

]]> By: Jeanne Boyarsky https://www.selikoff.net/2013/10/05/smlunit-without-python/comment-page-1/#comment-6622 Mon, 14 Oct 2013 01:41:01 +0000 http://www.selikoff.net/?p=4852#comment-6622 Today I discovered the idiom for testing an exception is thrown: (functionToTest(); print(“\nFAIL\n”)) handle IllegalMove => print(“\nOK\n”)

]]>