<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Which Database to Start With?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.selikoff.net/2009/08/26/which-database-to-start-with/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.selikoff.net/2009/08/26/which-database-to-start-with/</link>
	<description>Java/J2EE Software Development and Technology Discussion Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 06:46:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Vishwa		</title>
		<link>https://www.selikoff.net/2009/08/26/which-database-to-start-with/comment-page-1/#comment-1851</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vishwa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 06:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.selikoff.net/blog/?p=1160#comment-1851</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I am a beginner and I&#039;ve tried with hsqldb, mysql and oracle.

MySql I thought was supposed to be a simple db, and there were lots of tutorial-code on net, where MySql was used. But then, I got bugged with its configuration diagnosis !!! Previous configurations remained intact even when I had updated them !!!

Oracle, though installation took a lot of time, was very clean, and easy to use !

Hsqldb was simple and easy. But I dint find good tools to use along with it. Maybe I din&#039;t look much.

Nice post !]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a beginner and I&#8217;ve tried with hsqldb, mysql and oracle.</p>
<p>MySql I thought was supposed to be a simple db, and there were lots of tutorial-code on net, where MySql was used. But then, I got bugged with its configuration diagnosis !!! Previous configurations remained intact even when I had updated them !!!</p>
<p>Oracle, though installation took a lot of time, was very clean, and easy to use !</p>
<p>Hsqldb was simple and easy. But I dint find good tools to use along with it. Maybe I din&#8217;t look much.</p>
<p>Nice post !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Raj		</title>
		<link>https://www.selikoff.net/2009/08/26/which-database-to-start-with/comment-page-1/#comment-1846</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Raj]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 09:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.selikoff.net/blog/?p=1160#comment-1846</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I prefer..
1. PostgreSQL
2. MySQL
3. MS SQL - Express]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prefer..<br />
1. PostgreSQL<br />
2. MySQL<br />
3. MS SQL &#8211; Express</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Kovica		</title>
		<link>https://www.selikoff.net/2009/08/26/which-database-to-start-with/comment-page-1/#comment-1840</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kovica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 07:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.selikoff.net/blog/?p=1160#comment-1840</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[couple of years are I&#039;d go with PostgreSQL, but now that DB2 has Express-C edition that is free, I&#039;d go with it. I&#039;d use it for small projects where database does not use more than 2cores and 2GB or RAM. For a project that would get funding I&#039;d go with other DB2 editions, depending on the funding. :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>couple of years are I&#8217;d go with PostgreSQL, but now that DB2 has Express-C edition that is free, I&#8217;d go with it. I&#8217;d use it for small projects where database does not use more than 2cores and 2GB or RAM. For a project that would get funding I&#8217;d go with other DB2 editions, depending on the funding. 🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Henry Ho		</title>
		<link>https://www.selikoff.net/2009/08/26/which-database-to-start-with/comment-page-1/#comment-1838</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Henry Ho]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 06:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.selikoff.net/blog/?p=1160#comment-1838</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Microsoft SQL Server Express, free.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft SQL Server Express, free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: scot mcphee		</title>
		<link>https://www.selikoff.net/2009/08/26/which-database-to-start-with/comment-page-1/#comment-1837</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[scot mcphee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 06:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.selikoff.net/blog/?p=1160#comment-1837</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This is a bit arbitrary I think. For a start, in Oracle-land, there is the free Oracle XE. That one&#039;s saved my butt a few times when I needed to write &quot;proper&quot; Oracle PL/SQL for things like procedures that will run correct and exactly the same on a big installation. So Oracle XE is very powerful and fully featured except for it&#039;s maximum allowed database size (4GB) and users (5, I think).

In other arenas big IBM shops will often have DB2, it&#039;s very powerful.

I can also vouch for PostgreSQL - of the fully free databases it&#039;s my pick over MySQL, which in my experience tends to be non-standard in things like connection protocols, and in the confusing array of underlying database file types, which influence what features you get. PostGreSQL feels more like a &quot;real&quot; database, it&#039;s powerful and fast and is free and I highly recommend it for people needing a powerful but free db alternative.

Derby is OK, HSQL OK, but mostly for the purposes of testing and development.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a bit arbitrary I think. For a start, in Oracle-land, there is the free Oracle XE. That one&#8217;s saved my butt a few times when I needed to write &#8220;proper&#8221; Oracle PL/SQL for things like procedures that will run correct and exactly the same on a big installation. So Oracle XE is very powerful and fully featured except for it&#8217;s maximum allowed database size (4GB) and users (5, I think).</p>
<p>In other arenas big IBM shops will often have DB2, it&#8217;s very powerful.</p>
<p>I can also vouch for PostgreSQL &#8211; of the fully free databases it&#8217;s my pick over MySQL, which in my experience tends to be non-standard in things like connection protocols, and in the confusing array of underlying database file types, which influence what features you get. PostGreSQL feels more like a &#8220;real&#8221; database, it&#8217;s powerful and fast and is free and I highly recommend it for people needing a powerful but free db alternative.</p>
<p>Derby is OK, HSQL OK, but mostly for the purposes of testing and development.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Scott Selikoff		</title>
		<link>https://www.selikoff.net/2009/08/26/which-database-to-start-with/comment-page-1/#comment-1836</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Selikoff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 01:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.selikoff.net/blog/?p=1160#comment-1836</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t get me started on Derby, I had the misfortune of using it on a J2EE project I inheritted.  Most unstable DBMS I&#039;ve ever used, and I&#039;ve used them all.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t get me started on Derby, I had the misfortune of using it on a J2EE project I inheritted.  Most unstable DBMS I&#8217;ve ever used, and I&#8217;ve used them all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jeanne Boyarsky		</title>
		<link>https://www.selikoff.net/2009/08/26/which-database-to-start-with/comment-page-1/#comment-1835</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeanne Boyarsky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 01:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.selikoff.net/blog/?p=1160#comment-1835</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I found PostgreSQL to be just as easy to install locally as mySql.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found PostgreSQL to be just as easy to install locally as mySql.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: pratik patel		</title>
		<link>https://www.selikoff.net/2009/08/26/which-database-to-start-with/comment-page-1/#comment-1833</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pratik patel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 01:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.selikoff.net/blog/?p=1160#comment-1833</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Use PostreSQL. You won&#039;t be sorry. It&#039;s more a full featured DB.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Use PostreSQL. You won&#8217;t be sorry. It&#8217;s more a full featured DB.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jose Fernandez		</title>
		<link>https://www.selikoff.net/2009/08/26/which-database-to-start-with/comment-page-1/#comment-1832</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jose Fernandez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 00:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.selikoff.net/blog/?p=1160#comment-1832</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I thought I saw plenty of tools for Oracle myself, but granted, not many free ones. My coworker raves about SQL Developer.

I wouldn&#039;t recommend MS SQL Server to start with as there are too many non-standard syntax conventions.

PostgreSQL has probably the most compliant syntax out there and would be great for a beginner. They would have the least amount of trouble getting something working from any ordinary SQL book.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought I saw plenty of tools for Oracle myself, but granted, not many free ones. My coworker raves about SQL Developer.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t recommend MS SQL Server to start with as there are too many non-standard syntax conventions.</p>
<p>PostgreSQL has probably the most compliant syntax out there and would be great for a beginner. They would have the least amount of trouble getting something working from any ordinary SQL book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Marcos Hernandez		</title>
		<link>https://www.selikoff.net/2009/08/26/which-database-to-start-with/comment-page-1/#comment-1831</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marcos Hernandez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 22:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.selikoff.net/blog/?p=1160#comment-1831</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In Oracle exist the express edition too, with limit to 4 GB. Exist a tool, SQL Developer and is free. In comercial version include power tools to manipulate the database.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Oracle exist the express edition too, with limit to 4 GB. Exist a tool, SQL Developer and is free. In comercial version include power tools to manipulate the database.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
