<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Down Home Country Coding With Scott Selikoff and Jeanne Boyarsky</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.selikoff.net/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.selikoff.net</link>
	<description>Java/J2EE Software Development and Technology Discussion Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 04:10:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Subscriber Accounts Now Available</title>
		<link>http://www.selikoff.net/2010/03/03/subscriber-accounts-now-available/</link>
		<comments>http://www.selikoff.net/2010/03/03/subscriber-accounts-now-available/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 04:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Selikoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.selikoff.net/?p=1748</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For those who visit this blog regularly, you can now create a subscriber account.  The primary advantage is that your comments no longer need to be anonymous.  Creating a subscriber account takes only a minute and after logging in, all your account information and contact information will be available for you to post [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.selikoff.net/2010/03/03/subscriber-accounts-now-available/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>another reason % of time writing tests is meaningless</title>
		<link>http://www.selikoff.net/2010/02/27/another-reason-of-time-writing-tests-is-meaningless/</link>
		<comments>http://www.selikoff.net/2010/02/27/another-reason-of-time-writing-tests-is-meaningless/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 22:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeanne Boyarsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Development Process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[testing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.selikoff.net/?p=1742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier in the month, I blogged a response to – “What would you say is the average percentage of development time devoted to creating the unit test scripts?”.  As I was telling a friend about it, I realized that I missed an important point!
The question also implies that development time is constant.  Or maybe not.   [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.selikoff.net/2010/02/27/another-reason-of-time-writing-tests-is-meaningless/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>a response to &#8211; &#8220;What would you say is the average percentage of development time devoted to creating the unit test scripts?&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.selikoff.net/2010/02/14/a-response-to-what-would-you-say-is-the-average-percentage-of-development-time-devoted-to-creating-the-unit-test-scripts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.selikoff.net/2010/02/14/a-response-to-what-would-you-say-is-the-average-percentage-of-development-time-devoted-to-creating-the-unit-test-scripts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 18:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeanne Boyarsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Development Process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Java/J2EE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[testing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.selikoff.net/?p=1738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How long does it take to compile? We don&#8217;t ask that. It would be absurd. The fact that people ask how long unit testing takes mean they see it as an optional cost to be incurred. What I want to know is why they don&#8217;t ask for a similar accounting of the cost of NOT [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.selikoff.net/2010/02/14/a-response-to-what-would-you-say-is-the-average-percentage-of-development-time-devoted-to-creating-the-unit-test-scripts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Refactoring JUnit 3.8 to 4.0 when hierarchy extends TestCase</title>
		<link>http://www.selikoff.net/2010/02/02/refactoring-junit-3-8-to-4-0-when-hierarchy-extends-testcase/</link>
		<comments>http://www.selikoff.net/2010/02/02/refactoring-junit-3-8-to-4-0-when-hierarchy-extends-testcase/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 04:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeanne Boyarsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Java/J2EE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[junit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[testing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.selikoff.net/?p=1500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Problem:
I want to start writing tests in JUnit 4.0, but I have a lot of tests in JUnit 3.8.  I can&#8217;t just start writing tests in 4.0, because I rely on common setup/assertions in my custom superclass which extends TestCase.  (Which means JUnit will only look for 3.8 style tests)
Solution:
Create one or more new [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.selikoff.net/2010/02/02/refactoring-junit-3-8-to-4-0-when-hierarchy-extends-testcase/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where&#8217;s the Flex Plug-in for Eclipse 3.5?</title>
		<link>http://www.selikoff.net/2010/01/28/wheres-the-flex-plug-in-for-eclipse-3-5/</link>
		<comments>http://www.selikoff.net/2010/01/28/wheres-the-flex-plug-in-for-eclipse-3-5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 15:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Selikoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Flex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eclipse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plug-in]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[update]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.selikoff.net/?p=1699</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Over 7 months after Eclipse 3.5 (Galileo)  was released, Adobe still has not released an update for its popular Flex Builder 3 plug-in that would make it compatible with the most recent version of Eclipse.  Those of us who rely on the plug-in for Flex/Air development are still stuck using Eclipse 3.4 (Ganymede), [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.selikoff.net/2010/01/28/wheres-the-flex-plug-in-for-eclipse-3-5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The LED Revolution</title>
		<link>http://www.selikoff.net/2010/01/22/the-led-revolution/</link>
		<comments>http://www.selikoff.net/2010/01/22/the-led-revolution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 15:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Selikoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lcd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[led]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[light]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[light bulbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[printers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.selikoff.net/?p=1639</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.selikoff.net/2010/01/22/the-led-revolution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>javaranch forums go mobile</title>
		<link>http://www.selikoff.net/2010/01/03/javaranch-forums-go-mobile/</link>
		<comments>http://www.selikoff.net/2010/01/03/javaranch-forums-go-mobile/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 17:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeanne Boyarsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[JavaRanch Forum Migration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[droid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.selikoff.net/?p=1633</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Want to know what went  on behind the scenes of JavaRanch&#8217;s mobile site creation?
Timeline

January 2009 &#8211; We started talking about how poorly the site renders on a BlackBerry
July 2009 &#8211; I got a BlackBerry for work.  And ugh.  The forums do look horrible.
August 2009 &#8211; Tried out BlackBerry emulator and explored the minimalistic approach possible [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.selikoff.net/2010/01/03/javaranch-forums-go-mobile/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>how to test a local web application in droid simulator</title>
		<link>http://www.selikoff.net/2010/01/02/how-to-test-a-local-web-application-in-droid-simulator/</link>
		<comments>http://www.selikoff.net/2010/01/02/how-to-test-a-local-web-application-in-droid-simulator/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 01:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeanne Boyarsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[JavaRanch Forum Migration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[droid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emulator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.selikoff.net/?p=1628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In August, I blogged about how to use the blackberry simulator because information was so scarce.  I&#8217;m happy to say the Android emulator documentation is much better.
My goal
About a month ago, beta testers of  JavaRanch’s JForum implementation told me the iPhone and the Droid had a large blank column on the right side of the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.selikoff.net/2010/01/02/how-to-test-a-local-web-application-in-droid-simulator/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Happy New Year!</title>
		<link>http://www.selikoff.net/2009/12/31/happy-new-year/</link>
		<comments>http://www.selikoff.net/2009/12/31/happy-new-year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 23:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Selikoff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.selikoff.net/?p=1622</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Jeanne and I, we&#8217;d like to wish everyone a happy, healthy, and safe new year.  This year has been stressful for many, myself included, and here&#8217;s looking forward to a more peaceful, hopefully more relaxing,  2010.  Happy new year everyone!
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.selikoff.net/2009/12/31/happy-new-year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>female programmers and programmers to be</title>
		<link>http://www.selikoff.net/2009/12/18/female-programmers-and-programmers-to-be/</link>
		<comments>http://www.selikoff.net/2009/12/18/female-programmers-and-programmers-to-be/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 02:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeanne Boyarsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.selikoff.net/?p=1614</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kathy Sierra has been tweeting about Women in Technology over the last week or so.  Today&#8217;s tweet really got me thinking.
Tired of being a Woman In Tech. I&#8217;m a programmer. I&#8217;m female. Does it have to be SO political/significant? Sometimes a coder&#8217;s just a coder. -Kathy Sierra
While I certainly haven&#8217;t been in the field as [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.selikoff.net/2009/12/18/female-programmers-and-programmers-to-be/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
